From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BASE_PURESIZE Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:35:49 +0200 Message-ID: <833a5agou2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8363a6gytm.fsf@gnu.org> <834opqgpzs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256308777 15150 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2009 14:39:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 16:39:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N1LIZ-0004en-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:39:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1LIZ-0003EX-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:39:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1LH5-0002mS-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1LH0-0002jn-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58315 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1LH0-0002jZ-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52151) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1LH0-0002aq-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KRZ002001RRH700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:37:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.77.20]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KRZ002B11YW8410@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:37:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116328 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:24:26 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >> > Isn't the current definition of BASE_PURESIZE too large? > >> > >> Fits quite well here (pure_size - pure_bytes_used == 79770). > > > > What configuration is that? > > powerpc-suse-linux That's strange. Is that a 64-bit system? If so, do you have any ideas why two different GNU/Linux systems, one on x86_64, the other yours, have such significantly different pure space usage sizes?