From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5813: remove __DJGPP__ version tests Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:37:28 +0300 Message-ID: <8339zfxjyf.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270137362 8224 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2010 15:56:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5813-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 17:55:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMkP-000601-Cc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:55:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxMkO-0001EQ-Nm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NxMkJ-0001E2-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33035 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxMkG-0001DZ-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMkD-0007Aq-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMkD-0007Ak-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMT4-0004Zj-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:38:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 5813@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 5813 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5813-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D5813.127013625517578 (code D ref 5813); Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5813-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2010 15:37:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMSd-0004ZT-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxMSb-0004ZO-DH for 5813-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0700D00FBG7T00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 5813-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:37:28 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0700CYTFEFHE20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:37:28 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:38:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:35855 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:33:03 -0400 > > Are the __DJGPP__ version tests still needed? > Can we assume __DJGPP__ >= 2 is true? > > Any reason not to remove them? Yes, it's time to forget about DJGPP < 2. Thanks for pointing this out. I removed all the tests for __DJGPP__. There are still 3 tests for __DJGPP_MINOR__, but they are in MSDOS-specific files (dosfns.c and msdos.c). I also updated CPP-DEFINES accordingly.