From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compositions and bidi display (was: bug#5977: 24.0.50; Lao HELLO is incorrectly displayed) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: <8339yhziyj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3A521851-F7CC-45DB-A2ED-8348EF96D5CF@Freenet.DE> <83fx2q5w86.fsf@gnu.org> <834oj22e96.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272338103 2245 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2010 03:15:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 27 05:15:02 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6bGE-0004qJ-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:14:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45185 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6bGD-0005xW-N8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6bG7-0005xH-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46147 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6bG6-0005x9-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6bG5-00012I-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6bG5-000128-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L1I00L00LTZ0W00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:13:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.125.239]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L1I00L4WM9OA600@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:13:01 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124235 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:29:18 +0900 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > All composition-related functions expect characters are in > logical order. The bottom-most library for OTF handling > (libotf) requires it because OpenType tables expect > characters in logical order. Btw, where does libotf come into this picture? That is, which libotf functions we use for composite characters, and at what stage in the redisplay process?