From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:52 +0200 Message-ID: <8339pwh0zv.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292601456 1492 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 15:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 16:57:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTcd7-0006cf-NW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:57:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53315 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTcd2-0003td-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54285 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTccr-0002xu-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTcbq-00033c-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:52:43 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTcbq-00033Y-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTc98-0007c9-1d; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7651 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7651-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7651.129259936529246 (code B ref 7651); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2010 15:22:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTc8q-0007be-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:22:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTc8f-0007bD-TJ for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LDK00500VVEEP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.167.122]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LDK005EFWBX8F30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:28:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:23:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42594 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:08:17 +0900 > > > The new Rmail-MIME feature is nice, but it has some rough edges. One > > of them is that I lost an easy way of displaying many text > > attachments. > > > Specifically, it looks like we display text attachments by default, > > but only if content-disposition is "inline". Maybe that's what the > > various RFCs mandate, but why isn't there at least a button to display > > the text (in the same or another buffer) if the user decides to do > > that? Another minor issue with rmail-mm is that the header lines it inserts in place of the attachments do not have a newline after them, so a typical message will end up being displayed in a buffer with no final newline. Not a big deal, obviously.