From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion to indicate fixed version when closing a bug Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8339csmct9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d3bwn7mu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkf05iqg.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323546284 25827 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2011 19:44:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 20:44:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSqd-0004zd-23 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:44:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSqc-0003hf-H8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:44:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSqa-0003ha-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:44:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSqZ-0003In-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSqZ-0003Ij-3D; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LW000M006RI0K00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:44:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.199.182]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LW000KSG6U950W0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:44:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87zkf05iqg.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146624 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:28:39 -0500 > > Also, it's useful for those who are following the bug and are curious to > see how it was fixed. If their only entry point is the bug report > itself, they can quickly go from that to the diff that will satisfy > their curiosity (which is good for Emacs because it promotes code > review, and in the long run draws people into becoming developers). For that, the revision in which the bug is fixed is enough.