From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11649: 24.1.50; Some compilation woes Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:52:19 +0300 Message-ID: <833963ubdo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r4tou93e.fsf@gnu.org> <83lijwu2zf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339296763 12472 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2012 02:52:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11649@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 04:52:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYGe-0003DS-G3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:52:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYGe-0001Rp-6D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYGa-0001RZ-Ie for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:52:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYGY-00037r-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYGY-00037n-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYIw-0007Bv-Ga for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11649.133929688927625 (code B ref 11649); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2012 02:54:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYIj-0007BV-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:54:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:33316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdYIe-0007BL-Q7 for 11649@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5D00I00RSBMJ00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11649@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:52:14 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5D00I57RZ2HD90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:52:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60829 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 21:28:28 +0200 > Cc: 11649@debbugs.gnu.org >=20 > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > Are you saying that there's some bug in the byte compiler? =C2= =A0You may be > > right, although I don't see why the value 1200 should be OK, but = 2200 > > shouldn't. >=20 > No, I'm saying that I don't see a problem in the way it is currentl= y > done on Windows because, at the end, even doing it as it is done in > POSIX does not guarantee that you won't be forced to use a greater > stack depth sooner or later, because it depends on the small number= of > files that are compiled with the interpreted byte-compiler, and the= se > files are not static; they can grow bigger or more complex and > eventually, someday, trigger the same stack depth error. Unless I'v= e > failed to understand you. No, you understood me. That's why I didn't hesitate to enlarge the stack size.