From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13661: 24.3.50; shell-command fails with w32-downcase-file-names Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:33:02 +0200 Message-ID: <8338x47my9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <51165eaf.c518b40a.03ed.ffffc057@mx.google.com> <83fw157881.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9rd6zr9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360474473 12240 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2013 05:34:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13661@debbugs.gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 06:34:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PYu-00085S-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:34:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59361 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PY2-0007dd-78 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PXz-0007dY-PK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PXy-000623-KD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PXy-00061q-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PYA-0004yA-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13661.136047439419045 (code B ref 13661); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 05:33:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PXO-0004x8-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40921) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4PXN-0004x1-5q for 13661@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:33:13 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHZ00I00OBFNW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13661@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:32:58 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHZ00I2YOQYCEZ0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:32:58 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70986 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:43:59 +0000 > From: Richard Copley > > > Damn that w32-downcase-file-names option! Why are people still using it in the year 2013?? > > I don't remember why I use it (something to do with RCS I expect) I'd be curious to know how RCS is related to this. I use it myself. > but I'll stop, and report any issues if they surface. Thank you.