From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Loading souce Elisp faster Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: <8338wiyfaz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87hal05omn.fsf@engster.org> <83bob7hv37.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361912762 17928 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2013 21:06:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 22:06:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UARj9-0001Gu-SW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:06:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UARio-00045J-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:05:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UARij-00044x-Pf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UARig-0005B6-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:42137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UARPc-0005se-9M; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MIU00300HFYG700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:46:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MIU003Z1HOOET30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:46:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157402 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:19:57 -0500 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: deng@randomsample.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Since Emacs now uses utf-8 based encoding internally, conversion from > utf-8 is a no-op (except for the EOL conversion). > > I don't think that is true. The Emacs internal encoding is not > identical to Unicode It is identical for all the characters that are valid Unicode codepoints. > and conversion to or from utf-8 is not a no-op. See decode_coding_utf_8.