From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info Directory: What counts as an editing mode? Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:48:59 +0300 Message-ID: <8338qpxpes.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pptthgxu.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <838v0hxz9v.fsf@gnu.org> <87li4hgw91.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375642171 18170 80.91.229.3 (4 Aug 2013 18:49:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 18:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 04 20:49:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V63My-0002SM-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 20:49:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V63Mx-0000cL-Oa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V63Mp-0000aX-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V63Mh-0002Zb-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:36824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V63Mh-0002ZP-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MR000900S5CD600@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:48:53 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MR0009ECS9H8940@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:48:53 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87li4hgw91.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162416 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 20:13:14 +0200 > > if size is the reason for putting those other packages under a > separate heading, then the heading chosen is rather misleading. I don't think that was the reason, it just happened. > Moreover, EDT and VIPER are also multifile and VIPER is also quite > large. Those are emulations of other editors, so they are different.