From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17298: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:16:28 +0300 Message-ID: <8338h7duer.fsf@gnu.org> References: <40a6685b-a96b-427c-b9ba-a31d3dfadcf3@default> <831twtgtyo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398064646 16939 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 07:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 17298@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 09:17:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Tc-0007qQ-U3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:17:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47864 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Tc-00052k-G9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8TU-00051o-BK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8TP-0007OO-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8TP-0007OK-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8TO-0005Bz-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17298 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17298-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17298.139806460519920 (code B ref 17298); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2014 07:16:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8T6-0005BC-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:51691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8T2-0005Aw-S3 for 17298@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4D00200D9XTM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 17298@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:16:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4D002OADJQRH30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:16:39 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88180 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 17298@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:57:59 -0400 > > > I really wish someone who knows those parts of Emacs would look into > > this problem. > > I installed a patch which seems to make sense (makes the code agree > with the comment, at least), but I have a hard time believing that this > has been with us for so long and hasn't bitten us earlier. Thanks. I agree with your doubts. Let's see what happens with these assertion violations.