From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18626: 24.3.94; communication with subprocess is slow Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:40:12 +0300 Message-ID: <8338b2oa0j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <85wq8ge3gr.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85d2a8dzkh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83lhowgrr3.fsf@gnu.org> <854mviej2x.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412520087 22009 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2014 14:41:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 14:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 05 16:41:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamzv-0002Pp-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:41:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47666 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamzs-0005WJ-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamzk-0005Va-QJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamzf-0001Q9-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamzf-0001Q3-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamze-00063H-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:41:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18626.141252001623193 (code B ref 18626); Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2014 14:40:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamyt-00061z-Hv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:34115) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xamym-00061n-U7 for 18626@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NCZ001007AF7U00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 18626@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:40:07 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NCZ001GL7EU2WA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:40:07 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <854mviej2x.fsf@stephe-leake.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94166 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Leake > Cc: 18626@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 08:34:30 -0500 > > But I'd like to understand the delay on reading from subprocesses. Did you now? in any case, reading from subprocesses was not changed in any way, only writing to subprocesses was.