From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18900: 24.4; please don't include view-lossage in bug reports by default Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:07:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83389xvan2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mw8ef0uf.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <9rmw87o343.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d291vec0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415207394 32432 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2014 17:09:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david@tethera.net, 18900@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 18:09:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm45a-0003hp-EQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:09:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm45a-00063K-0k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm44y-0005On-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm44s-0000rC-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm44s-0000r3-F1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm44r-0003mV-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18900 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18900-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18900.141520728614459 (code B ref 18900); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2014 17:08:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm43x-0003l8-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:08:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:46891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm43k-0003kT-2B for 18900@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NEK00600SMZ0000@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 18900@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:03:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NEK00MEZSPKI780@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:03:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95555 > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 18900@debbugs.gnu.org, david@tethera.net > Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:47:56 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Thanks, but why on the release branch? There shouldn't be behavior > > changes and non-bugfixes there... > > Because silently including someone's private data in a bug report would > be a bad bug IMO. We've been doing that for eons...