From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19660: Acknowledgement (24.4.51; Crash in draw_row_fringe_bitmaps) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:46:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83386ysw1g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54C1EA6B.3000007@swipnet.se> <768087C3-7B81-44FD-BCCC-629535681556@swipnet.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422200831 14339 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2015 15:47:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19660@debbugs.gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 25 16:47:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPP4-0006wV-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:47:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38083 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPP3-0000A3-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOz-00008u-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOw-0007AK-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOw-0007AG-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOw-00076B-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19660 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19660-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19660.142220080527239 (code B ref 19660); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19660) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2015 15:46:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOe-00075F-MI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:51435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFPOb-00074l-CV for 19660@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIQ00N00OXTVQ00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 19660@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:43:07 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIQ00FIROZVLJ70@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:43:07 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <768087C3-7B81-44FD-BCCC-629535681556@swipnet.se> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98706 Archived-At: > From: "Jan D." > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:17:20 +0100 > > Fixed, but it would be nice to know why this function needs input blocked. This was there since day one, according to the history. Unless Kim, who wrote it (CC'ed), can recollect why he put the assertion there, I'm afraid the reason is lost in time. My wild guess would be that the reason is this function calls X APIs to actually draw stuff, and many of those block input. Perhaps Kim wasn't sure whether input should be blocked here. If no other information emerges, my suggestion would be to remove the assertion on master, and see if we get any bug reports. Thanks.