From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs trunk crash Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:33:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83384vsp89.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834mpevkao.fsf@gnu.org> <837fu8srym.fsf@gnu.org> <83619ssrng.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427124852 29183 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2015 15:34:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 23 16:34:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya4MX-00026p-Nv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:33:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya4MW-0008Pe-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya4MK-0008Dj-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya4MH-0001Pc-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:58165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya4MH-0001PN-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLO00J008ET2000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:33:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLO00IJM8K3XZ80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:33:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184140 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:35:01 -0400 > > > Btw, undo-tree is not part of Emacs, > > Well, that's a philosophical discussion: it's in GNU ELPA, so it's > covered by copyright assignments to Emacs (so in this sense, it's part > of Emacs). > > > so perhaps it does something it shouldn't. > > Not really more likely than if it were a package bundled with Emacs. Packages that are not bundled get less scrutiny from the core team, so they are more likely to do questionable things, or fall out of sync. On average, of course; I know nothing about undo-tree specifically.