From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:48:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83384totnx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150324163714.GA27775@thyrsus.com> <83y4mmpb1n.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhim9sqp.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427305715 25747 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2015 17:48:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 18:48:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YapPf-0006fJ-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:48:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40538 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapPe-0004kd-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapPa-0004kS-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapPX-00079O-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:34041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapPX-000791-2b; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLS00E003TQA100@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:43:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLS0021B3W3ADB0@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:43:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184240 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:43:13 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: eliz@gnu.org, esr@thyrsus.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > Why cannot VC determine whether a branch is private or not? > > > A branch can be both at the same time. > > People who are doing such sophisticated things will understand the > issues and can use whatever interface to specify what they want. They are the majority nowadays. A feature that helps a tiny minority, but gets in the way of the rest will not be well accepted. We need to find a way to do this more intelligently, keeping in mind more than just one workflow.