From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 24.5 second release candidate Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:24:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83384iqw8h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87619fvb9s.fsf@blueberry.home> <87384juhme.fsf@blueberry.home> <87zj6qtzch.fsf@blueberry.home> <20150402140228.GB23848@acm.fritz.box> <87y4matwhd.fsf@blueberry.home> <837ftuqzrm.fsf@gnu.org> <20150402161950.GD23848@acm.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427995495 29171 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2015 17:24:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 02 19:24:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdirF-0002fA-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:24:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59522 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdirE-0007YC-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdirB-0007Y4-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydir8-0005xk-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:43420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydir7-0005xU-Tk; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NM600D00W1GRB00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:25:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NM60081SWEXUM60@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:25:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <20150402161950.GD23848@acm.fritz.box> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184795 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:19:50 +0000 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , nicolas@petton.fr, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > I think Stefan means bug #19669. > > "Long enums" used to be a problem for fontification when a jit-lock > 500-byte chunk started in the middle of the braces, when the lack of > syntactic context would cause that chunk not to be fontified. #19669 > had things in common with that old state. But you seem to think the culprit was another change, not the one prompted by #19669?