From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:45:42 +0300 Message-ID: <8337y6mut5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <56000DEB.1000306@yandex.ru> <83si67n4ch.fsf@gnu.org> <5600373A.6090206@yandex.ru> <83oagvn1lz.fsf@gnu.org> <56003D57.2080102@yandex.ru> <83mvwfmviy.fsf@gnu.org> <56005B96.2090006@yandex.ru> <83h9mnmtwj.fsf@gnu.org> <560152B5.7090005@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442929570 12927 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2015 13:46:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 15:45:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeNtL-0002LI-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:45:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeNtL-0006M8-8G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeNt3-0006Ls-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:45:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeNsz-0000RL-Ez for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:51006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeNsz-0000R2-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NV200E00Z594000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:45:30 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NV200D94ZJULW60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:45:30 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <560152B5.7090005@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190246 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:08:05 +0300 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > The idea of the proposal, namely, call 'revert' when 'reset' followed > > by 'push' would fail, was to avoid the failure. > > It could work as a fallback, yes, after we have the "unsafe" predicate > implemented. The user would need to be warned in some very obvious way, > though. I agree. I think "rollback" should always trigger a warning, with any VCS.