From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A proposal for removing obsolete packages Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:52:32 +0200 Message-ID: <8337ts9dnz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83twmkkv16.fsf@gnu.org> <838u3k9m5d.fsf@gnu.org> <8760yohtqq.fsf@fastmail.fm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453323161 18050 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2016 20:52:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ahyatt@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9s_Ram=EDrez?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 21:52:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzk3-0008KL-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:52:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzk3-00074S-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzk0-000748-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzjx-0001ZH-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzjw-0001Z7-Um; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3921 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aLzjp-0001zI-M3; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <8760yohtqq.fsf@fastmail.fm> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?And?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?r=E9s_Ram=EDrez?= on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:38:05 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198455 Archived-At: > From: Andrés Ramírez > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:38:05 -0500 > > What about byte-compilation. > Does obsolete packages should be byte-compiled when compiling emacs? Why not?