From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:05:43 +0200
Message-ID: <8337rymqjc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAFyQvY2MVO7TgpG9bM+rDBsdBpTMryMSJL2yw37+qHZh6BGZ9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<56E0D27E.3030303@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2lan7n3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<22241.24253.891410.492540@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457615161 9343 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2016 13:06:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:06:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: kaushal.modi@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 14:06:00 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ae0Ht-0000vg-49
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:05:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48288 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ae0Hs-0005FM-Gf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:05:56 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48155)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ae0HW-0005Dm-Bv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:05:40 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ae0HV-00023L-In
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:05:34 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41444)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1ae0HR-00022f-Od; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:05:29 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1345
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1ae0HQ-0007kU-V1; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:05:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <22241.24253.891410.492540@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (message from
	Ulrich Mueller on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:47:09 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201377
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/201377>

> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:47:09 +0100
> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>         kaushal.modi@gmail.com
> From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
> 
> > Maybe we should even make that the default?  Does anyone still use
> > the ctags that is distributed with Emacs?
> 
> Wouldn't that argument apply to etags as well?

No, because the Exuberant program is named "ctags", not "etags".