From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] widen-limits c331b66: Implement buffer-widen-limits functionality Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:56:33 +0200 Message-ID: <8337rf3m4u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737riqouj.fsf@gmail.com> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3f12oo5.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2D156.9040401@online.de> <83k2kt2i51.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E643.4060903@online.de> <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> <837fgs35q3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458835047 18976 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 15:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: spinuvit@gmail.com, andreas.roehler@online.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 16:57:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7dR-000170-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:57:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51265 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7dR-0003TI-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7cx-0003Jt-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:56:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7cu-0004yB-De for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7cu-0004y7-AW; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3361 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aj7ct-0000O4-Ej; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:56:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:24:37 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202182 Archived-At: > Cc: andreas.roehler@online.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:24:37 +0200 > > On 03/24/2016 05:38 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> [prog-indentation-context] > > > Should we rip them out, as long as it's not too late? > > Yes. If nobody beats me to it, I'll revert it in emacs-25 this weekend. > The yet-unfinished discussion aside, it doesn't look ready for 25.1 > either way. If you want to leave it in the code on master, don't forget to puts some telltale phrase in the commit log. > I'm sorry you had to work on documenting it; hopefully we can reuse the > pieces of that text, or at least refer to it when documenting the > eventual alternative approach. Stuff happens. If we learn from this experience for the future, at least the effort wouldn't be completely wasted.