From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bugs related to buffer-local tags-file-name Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <8337iaru8k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zikr4a8y.fsf@gmail.com> <3f470a39-6bd4-bbb4-c693-ef889118fdf2@yandex.ru> <87wpfv3qrm.fsf@gmail.com> <838ts86atl.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3603t7o.fsf@gnu.org> <83twau1n0u.fsf@gnu.org> <87poli3ztj.fsf@gmail.com> <83polexkop.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1herv8x.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480445799 28606 195.159.176.226 (29 Nov 2016 18:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Josiah Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 29 19:56:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBnZy-0006r3-S1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:56:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBna2-0002gy-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBnZM-0002gs-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBnZI-0006aI-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBnZI-0006aE-11; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:55:52 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1156 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cBnZG-0002LH-0W; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:55:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <87d1herv8x.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Josiah Schwab on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:33:50 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209751 Archived-At: > From: Josiah Schwab > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:33:50 -0800 > > > should I just push the changes? > > I saw that the 25.1.90 pretest was released yesterday. After you've > pushed them, will these changes still be able make it into 25.2 or will > they have to wait until 26.1 (or whatever version is next)? I'd feel uneasy about pushing this to the release branch. For starters, these issues don't fit the criteria for what should go into 25.2, criteria that I myself defined. In addition, the changes are quite pervasive, and might potentially cause problems in use cases I didn't test. So my intention was to push this to the master branch, which means they will be available in Emacs 26.