From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'? Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:43:43 +0200 Message-ID: <8337fxx6fk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y3xq2k17.fsf@secondfloor.xyz> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485963932 20155 195.159.176.226 (1 Feb 2017 15:45:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:45:32 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 16:45:27 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx65-0004zA-9L for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:45:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx6A-0001bu-Pk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx4r-00019k-3K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx4m-000258-ES for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx4m-000251-BE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1687 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cYx4l-00029C-3p for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:44:04 -0500 In-reply-to: <87y3xq2k17.fsf@secondfloor.xyz> (message from Christopher Pinon on Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:05:40 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:112229 Archived-At: > From: Christopher Pinon > Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:05:40 +0100 > > > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Rmail-Reply.html > > suggests (on my reading) that typing 'r' will add the 'CC' field to the > header if the incoming message contains recipients in this field. In > contrast, typing 'C-u r' will omit the 'CC' field entirely. > > Unfortunately, in my testing, typing 'r' (like 'C-u r') omits the 'CC' > field when the incoming message contains recipients in this field, and I > have to add this field manually if I want to have it. That's not what I see here, with Rmail: 'r' responds to the "From" address, and places all the addresses from "To" and "CC" (if any) in the "CC" field of the response. "C-u r" produces a response with a single address in "To", and no "CC". I wonder why this doesn't happen to you. Maybe you have some customizations which cause this?