From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:24:13 +0300 Message-ID: <8337a3j8te.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8yjcem0.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499786702 18679 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 15:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:25:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 17:24:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx1v-0004GR-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:24:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx20-0003ax-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx1S-0003aT-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx1N-0001EH-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:24:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx1N-0001EB-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1303 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx1M-0007lk-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:24:16 -0400 In-reply-to: <87h8yjcem0.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:00:55 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216482 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:00:55 +0200 > > I'm not sure if this is a problem or intended design: Not consciously intended, just the "natural" thing. > If I customize line-number-current-line to have a background colour, > then when the current line is wrapped, the current line number and the > empty space(s) below it have that backround applied. I was hoping to > have that apply just to the line number itself. Are you talking about display-line-numbers set to t, and then about the empty field displayed for continuation lines, which show no numbers? Otherwise I don't understand what you mean by "empty space(s) below it". If you indeed mean continuation lines, I'd like to hear from others what they think about this use case. Displaying the empty fields in a face different from the number itself is some work, but I will do it if that's the "popular demand". > In any case, it's a minor issue, I've removed nlinum from my > setup. Thanks for your work on this Eli. You are welcome, and thanks for the feedback.