From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about test failure on Hydra Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:49:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83379b1jqb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87efsxexf5.fsf@rosalinde> <83r2wx29w9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760e9eksb.fsf@rosalinde> <83ini91e2o.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw1t7yk5.fsf@rosalinde> <838tj40ymm.fsf@gnu.org> <87shhb7gqt.fsf@rosalinde> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501595420 19554 195.159.176.226 (1 Aug 2017 13:50:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 15:50:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXYn-0004Wt-Qy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:50:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXYt-00058m-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:50:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXY6-00057U-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXY4-0004FK-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXY4-0004FE-05; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:49:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4663 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dcXY2-0004UB-6j; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:49:23 -0400 In-reply-to: <87shhb7gqt.fsf@rosalinde> (message from Stephen Berman on Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:57:14 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217202 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:57:14 +0200 > > On Tue, 01 Aug 2017 06:12:49 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Stephen Berman > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:20:10 +0200 > >> > >> (dired test-dir) reverts an existing Dired buffer, because of setting > >> dired-auto-revert-buffer to t. (When I step through the code, it is > >> after reverting that point moves to the subdirectory line > > > > By "the point moves" you mean what dired-restore-positions does? > > Yes. Then I'd begin with logging the values saved in POSITIONS that dired-restore-positions uses, perhaps the recorded positions are sometimes wrong. Then we could take it from there, either by looking how the values are recorded or how they are restored.