From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Redisplay slower in Emacs 28 than Emacs 27
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 20:49:02 +0200
Message-ID: <83360e6cip.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2012071512070453.19376@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2012071642450453.25897@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <877dptfvae.fsf@gnus.org>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2012071745150453.30032@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <83czzl8qwu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2012071935010453.5409@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <87sg8h78s8.fsf@gnus.org> <837dpt8lk5.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87pn3kjssr.fsf@gnus.org> <83im9c70vu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87im9cfeej.fsf@gnus.org> <837dps6xyv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87czzkdx57.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9dc5he3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87r1o0chk9.fsf@gnus.org> <83tusw5g5o.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwveek0401r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87360gaz7o.fsf@gnus.org>
 <jwv360g3s3c.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <jwvwnxr3oig.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <875z5b9a84.fsf@gnus.org>
 <jwvlfe73ndg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="11493"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: ghe@sdf.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 09 21:02:18 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kn5fE-0002oZ-OZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:02:16 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kn5fD-0002ON-NJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:02:15 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33928)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kn4WU-0005Ea-P0
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:49:10 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53251)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kn4WS-000477-PJ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:49:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2837 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kn4WR-0006jQ-Uk; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:49:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <jwvlfe73ndg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Tue, 08 Dec 2020 18:10:49 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260608
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/260608>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  ghe@sdf.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 18:10:49 -0500
> 
> > Nice; with that, my benchmark runs as fast as with my img_hash version.
> 
> Thanks, pushed to master,

Btw, any particular reason for the cutoff of 16 bytes to switch to the
"large chunk" branch?