From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to make Emacs popular again: Use monospaced fonts less Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:51:18 +0300 Message-ID: <8335vv2xyh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84273aa2-24a9-7584-18b9-03a5ac783d62@yandex.ru> <835z7vjrg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuvegkmo.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9ftf6n9.fsf@gnu.org> <835z7qfp6h.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft6lgw5y.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <87blak0w9h.fsf@gnus.org> <83eeff39my.fsf@gnu.org> <838s5n317u.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23315"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 19:53:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lW0l4-0005uj-NC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:53:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lW0l3-0003mm-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:53:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lW0ip-0002mB-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lW0io-0004Z1-WC; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3653 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lW0il-00077s-3P; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:51:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:29:40 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267972 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:29:40 -0500 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > My problem is that this change makes header-line different from > > mode-line, which I think is undesirable. > > Oh, okay. Yes, that would be the drawback. Which is why I prefer that we change the mode-line face (if we thing using variable-pitch there is a good move), and leave header-line inheriting from mode-line as before. Then (a) mode line and header line will look the same by default, and (b) if someone wants a different face for both, they just need to change a single face, not 2 of them.