From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `unreadablep' Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 10:03:20 +0200 Message-ID: <8335mtht87.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl1imhnd.fsf@gnus.org> <8735mtje0u.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 16 09:07:49 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxlno-0006dH-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33550 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxlnn-0000gD-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:07:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxljp-0006es-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:03:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=53398 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxljp-0007h8-2m; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:03:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CynRvgcdcUR5tVgKlN9CFWWZMZFX3YEeowpbYEEgWzI=; b=TUwOUNjrBs17 AqlgLV3f70sdehgleqmlHFxcP8AUaTqWgo6RiQzdoTm5EeE6+EGrPZ53cGEibl9ToubZh0hzy5wwJ +MtFIO3CFauzA6ZKpSy4iYvLLJcRJh++zt0UcvGiCAwGV8/BdUukq1kCN3y7P8i9K0WmkOIqqZIS9 bWO7+qxKePuWtdWutsCWBATQ2TWeXMRjxK/gEidBLXw3kvBKCgmn4Zun62FF3RoSXKsXaJadV5mXZ PVZdBoO9HcEyXk/etUC7duyBfwilGaDOmfA5CPzZYQ8X/K2/hvzE8SrIWsEOGu6unqWvhjCc7aX5V khkGayA7pAEh7mxiE1BjNQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2923 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxljl-00069z-VQ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:03:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8735mtje0u.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:48:49 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282130 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Po Lu , Eli Zaretskii > > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:48:49 +0100 > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > My memory suggests the plan was to add something like > > a `print-unreadable-function` that gets called with the offending > > object. It could then print it any which way it wants, or signal an > > error or ... > > Then it seems like most everybody's who's weighed in is in favour of > that solution, but perhaps Eli has an opinion. Eli? It's fine by me, thanks.