From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58909: 29.0.50; [WIP PATCH] Deleting the last frame of an emacsclient doesn't ask to save Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:17:06 +0200 Message-ID: <8335b3dwrh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9a70f868-ca50-52fc-af3e-23813af104f2@gmail.com> <83zgdcduxm.fsf@gnu.org> <83bkpretpn.fsf@gnu.org> <837d0fepoz.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58909@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 07:18:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opkbG-00083n-07 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 07:18:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opkb9-00030D-5F; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opkb4-0002yR-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opkb4-0007A7-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opkb3-0007xk-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58909 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58909-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58909.166728344730567 (code B ref 58909); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58909) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2022 06:17:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opkaU-0007wx-UR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53068) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opkaT-0007wk-MC for 58909@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:17:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opkaO-00075j-8G; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:17:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=U37Xu2NVqu5RsHjXyjJ3Y5y2RpJnksUbN/PMjf52Y4g=; b=dUjj5wWGsl3x pU8FjEmxRH6MhmVO7zmGAfU7r2kIhSjggdIhcHPUsa96WCIwi17Lqeh8AnSb5yaq1ZH9VzxBvQGv6 S6Xk6VXJ7hvN7Fkc7IXXktF8ZHZKirTW8CL0t3hEGrBZKe3sQZsGG8CsyfAj5Uj0TgJm8yMb6ia7R hVsNbZbsW74kRwb+O0AP6HTkl2R/bDYSxMnenRtkep9C+F+VNliG0VUHj75bf/oUZ93jyqhACDEa0 aRTL2uUExcIHnX9Mf8jMojE0oKPk9APhb+o/XPT1NgKkHXRTrtnJ/9vSOCd8BsQFBRxZfcfRYXHKC Fc0oVtppDFEKOidWM8fPWg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opkaN-0007BM-IB; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:17:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Jim Porter on Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:28:01 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246744 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:28:01 -0700 > Cc: 58909@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Jim Porter > > > My interpretation of why "C-x C-c" prompts is that it does the same as > > when you use it from a non-client frame. We want the same UX in both > > cases. "C-x 5 0" should IMO likewise produce the same behavior in > > both cases. > > That's actually my goal too: I'd like to ensure that the UX for a client > frame is as similar as possible as for a non-client frame. Since we > disagree on what that similarity should be, I guess that means we have > different mental models for some part of this. If it helps, I'll try to > explain how I think of it. Thanks. Our notions of "similarity" are different. For me, it's the immediate effect of the command; for you, it's what happens in Emacs under the hood, in particular how many other "similar" frames remain.