From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 21:54:35 +0300 Message-ID: <8334z8brpw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838r90byil.fsf@gnu.org> <834jjobwx1.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66125@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 20 20:55:13 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Lw-00012e-0t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:55:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Le-000696-11; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Lc-00068v-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Lc-0006rg-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Ll-0008Tw-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66125 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66125-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66125.169523609632590 (code B ref 66125); Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2023 18:54:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2Lg-0008TZ-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2La-0008TC-Cw for 66125@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj2LL-0006l7-92; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:54:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=xP5pAtGNMNuwo+pvNwWvOdWnqWbW6lbHNlM+A+puOeM=; b=SMnCshLf4Iq2 hixuPa4OmlR3g3wWdOPpSQ3VELBuNbkV9DPJ5H2Hs3Nj8O8dE17HVl5JWbT/KI3uxBlZsKxRQ7TqL zSWmXCAzp9r9FjGvYss/ynpdiUnlpIuCb0t4uSXJFH+RpIK6HlYEsw8wMrQFYlA4GC9nTqZF+4keq Whdq9aFKdLHQaMkdxZDpLxlb0rqxHiKtUe88QIfAak5eG59tjVDwOgk125dR4qt/42jSEZGQ71tK1 oTEBv1KUrWM6Cp0cscvdZcgnDnOUPiCNUIyWCm8MyaKAomG8eE8fRexgDYw/GamgNUoqR2F0KnlJt 6cxeJIdXQrSZjfh6LiThzw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Ulrich Mueller on Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:21:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:270947 Archived-At: > From: Ulrich Mueller > Cc: 66125@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:21:03 +0200 > > >>>>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > OK, thanks. In its current form, this option will only make a > > difference if you remove the ja-dic files that came with the tarball, > > and then rebuild. We should improve this, > > Maybe omit ja-dic.{el,elc} from the tarball, when they depend on the > configuration? No, that's a cure that is worse than the disease: those dictionaries take a while to generate. I think I know how to fix this, please stay tuned. > > although it strikes me that such an obscure feature, which is also not > > recommended, perhaps doesn't deserve the effort... > > Somebody must have found the feature important enough to add a configure > option for it. :) No one intended for that option to be used. > To add some context, even if it is only loosely related: This originates > from Gentoo bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/914368 where a user observed a > segmentation fault in libgccjit when native-compiling ja-dic.el. > (However, that bug occured with a somewhat obscure system, and we don't > really have proof that it was related to the size of the file.) I have an AOT build on GNU/Linux, and I see a ja-dic*.eln file there, so I had no problems with natively compiling it. Ans segfaults in libgccjit should be reported to the GCC folks, I think.