From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67053: 29.1; Doc string of variable `dired-use-ls-dired' Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 09:14:32 +0200 Message-ID: <8334xcyd5z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5rldzec.fsf@jeremybryant.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jb@jeremybryant.net, 67053@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 11 08:16:11 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDy-0000FL-6g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:16:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDg-00035u-Nz; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDC-0002wi-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDB-0006sj-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:15:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDp-0007Xn-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 07:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67053.169968692628933 (code B ref 67053); Sat, 11 Nov 2023 07:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2023 07:15:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDG-0007Wb-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:15:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iDE-0007WN-Sk for 67053@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:15:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1iCV-0006nW-2M; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:14:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=JT611b75NtAOx3oaeChxWtMzGf1lTpy19GmwZxXwGCE=; b=OjGmhmHFM66h knF1L5fzFJfY4Pj4ayok5V4htTxjlRdLMAfudz3EC+UvAj2+4fK2t3MX60WI1M92FahvEh9Mnn41I CvmyTy5FJUUEX2D4N9XJG0DThTxV5O3a2jQi/nCw0eqQ5JHre7BxuQ5Znz0S8l+ox5MgaiC6H6zVi /26E+lK9SbEZm3ndW4v+O8yYfJnqHQL4Lx2xUHKZFeszWJvIxalQYlUCdtpmP8PKZNmc4835nnmT1 GJO5oSTOT4Awfnrigtx/o7imyH99hEbt4fpK1ijDpG8g2oxyBuKh6K0tkznGskcp57JUdamxWv2uZ pVsnOX1LsBYyNImlOAUUwg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 23:40:45 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:274140 Archived-At: > Cc: 67053@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Drew Adams > Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 23:40:45 +0000 > > The special value of `unspecified' apparently does _not_ > just mean that such a check is needed and will be done. > The value means that support isn't known, whether or > not the check has been done. No, it means the check has not been done yet, and will be done when needed. After the check the value will never be 'unspecified'.