From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:01:36 +0300 Message-ID: <831uvlyckf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> <87mxeaar26.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6DFF55.3000708@gmx.at> <87ehzlnaxj.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6E1D4C.7030601@gmx.at> <87littrcyy.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315844000 21762 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 16:13:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 18:13:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3989-0001L1-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:13:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38194 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R38xC-0000Rs-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:01:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R38x6-0000K7-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R38x5-0004m8-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R38x5-0004lN-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LRF0010036HC700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:01:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.9.62]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LRF0003B36NJPC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:01:36 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87littrcyy.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143938 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:34:45 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > Evaluating (frame-list) gives >=20 > (# #) >=20 > I have no idea what frame F1 is. The only displayed frame is > `emacs@qcore', which is what `emacsclient -c -n' creates. Frames whose names are F1, F2, etc. are terminal frames. Is it possible that the demonic Emacs doesn't delete the initial terminal frame, like an otherwise "normal" interactive session would?