From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.4 release build flags Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:59:32 +0200 Message-ID: <831uqixx57.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F255AE1.203@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327856545 12738 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 17:02:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 18:02:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrY92-0001vE-Bd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:02:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrY91-0007aR-22 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrY8y-0007aI-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrY8w-00015A-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:56341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrY8w-00014x-J1; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:02:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYK00300JB2U900@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:01:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.102.195]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYK003D1KMKWO20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:01:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F255AE1.203@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148009 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:42:41 -0700 > From: Christoph Scholtes > CC: Eli Zaretskii , Jason Rumney > > for the release build of Emacs 23.4 are the following options OK? > > configure.bat --no-debug --with-gcc --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include --cflags > -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include > > It's mainly a question about building an optimized build without debug > symbols. I think this is correct, yes.