From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:01:07 +0200 Message-ID: <831uq8d30c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F2EAF8E.3010106@alice.it> <83d39tcjdx.fsf@gnu.org> <837h01c8hn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328500874 11084 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 04:01:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 04:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 05:01:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFlP-0000KQ-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:01:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFlP-0001R7-30 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:01:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFlM-0001R2-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:01:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFlL-0002DG-OR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFlL-0002D5-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYY00L00DN5XA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:01:05 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.162.243]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYY00LJDDTSXO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:01:05 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148233 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 22:24:17 +0100 > Cc: angelo.graziosi@alice.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> I have not been following this particular thread, but my understanding > >> is that only a link to the relevant sources is needed now - if we can > >> guarantee that this works. (This was my understanding of a message > >> from RMS quite some time ago. I might have misunderstood it, though.) > > > > You misunderstood. > > If you think so then please explain to me what RMS meant here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00430.html Having sources near the binaries is the only practical way to satisfy both clauses mentioned in that thread.