From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12051: 24.1; rcirc-send-message doesn't take multibyte into account. Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:59:36 +0300 Message-ID: <831uj8jdl3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87boj3byqy.fsf@acerpad.localdomain> <83k3x1jx3p.fsf@gnu.org> <874no4apau.fsf@acerpad.localdomain> <83628kkgjw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1345050030 1188 80.91.229.3 (15 Aug 2012 17:00:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: b4283@bephor.org, 12051@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 15 19:00:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1gxG-00016c-L3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:00:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47174 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1gxF-0006me-O0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1gxB-0006lh-Nf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1gx8-0000ml-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1gx7-0000mL-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1h5Z-00087B-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12051 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12051-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12051.134505053531182 (code B ref 12051); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2012 17:08:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1h5T-00086t-Ch for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:39856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1h5Q-00086j-D5 for 12051@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8T00A0033LBR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12051@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:59:31 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8T009DV376TVA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:59:30 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63201 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Cc: Li Ian-Xue , 12051@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:10:45 +0800 > > On 2012-08-15 10:57 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > You can always stop at known characters, like whitespace. > > > > Anyway, another way is simply to assume the worst possible expansion > > ratio, and estimate the byte count before encoding. > > I make a small optimisation that calls encode-coding-region char by > char. Comments? I think it's terribly inefficient to encode the string one character at a time. Again, assuming the worst expansion is IMO much better, and will not force you to encode in a loop. But that's me.