From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Obsolete redisplay-end-trigger and lazy-lock.el Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:21:14 +0200 Message-ID: <831ud0cgqd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <510B7BAD.6010908@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359724907 4926 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2013 13:21:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 14:22:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1GZ5-0003Ni-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:21:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1GYn-0003Lb-CI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:21:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1GYh-0003KL-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1GYe-0005R0-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:21:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:33136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1GYe-0005Qc-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:21:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHJ00500LYVE500@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:21:23 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHJ0052EMFL9R90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:21:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <510B7BAD.6010908@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156757 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:24:13 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > > This stuff was marked obsolete in 2008, and the only user is lazy-lock.el; > if the latter has no real users, can we drop its low-level support? This is for Stefan to answer, AFAIU he has some kind of plan or desire to use this for things that now use the evil post-command-hook or other tricks. I'm on the fence wrt this. OTOH, removing this stuff will break lazy-lock.el, so if we are dropping this feature, we should delete lazy-lock.el and all its traces as well.