From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r101338: * lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el (syntax-ppss): More sanity check to catch Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:09:24 +0200 Message-ID: <831tz7ro3v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r47bi1e5.fsf@yandex.ru> <52F96284.50507@yandex.ru> <52FAE12B.6060101@yandex.ru> <52FC3BEE.60604@yandex.ru> <52FCD2B4.5080006@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392307790 9749 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2014 16:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 13 17:09:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyrL-0006OM-5u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:09:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyrK-0000QB-MF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:09:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyr7-0000Nx-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:09:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyqy-00043O-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:47325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyqy-00042U-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:09:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0X00H00ZALIM00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:08:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0X00BW2ZI6TC70@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:08:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <52FCD2B4.5080006@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169588 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:12:04 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Or do you mean that indirect buffers add their own overhead, just by > having (and somehow coordinating, I guess) the same contents? There's no coordination. Quite simply, the pointer to buffer text in an indirect buffer points to the text of its base buffer.