From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16901: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:26:29 +0200 Message-ID: <831tylvkq2.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393698432 13829 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2014 18:27:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16901@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, dmantipov@yandex.ru To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 19:27:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJod1-0004B8-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:27:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJod0-0002UM-Nb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:27:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJocs-0002U1-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:27:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoco-0001g3-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoco-0001fw-4g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJocn-0001AG-Kp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16901 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16901-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16901.13936984014446 (code B ref 16901); Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16901) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2014 18:26:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJocT-00019e-Bs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:26:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:60020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJocQ-00019R-9o for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:26:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1R00400S7AVG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:26:36 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1R004FNSKBVW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:26:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86452 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 09:42:26 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, 16901@debbugs.gnu.org > > If you like, I can revert to using an older Emacs build, to see if > I still get such crashes. Not unless you cannot possibly use the latest. Since the build with memory allocation checks is definitely on to something, I don't see a need for downgrading yet; it is much more efficient to try debugging the problems that are flagged to us.