From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17554: 24.3.91; [Regression] re-usage of dired *Marked Files* buffer window Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:48:17 +0300 Message-ID: <831tvlm4f2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <22309.78500.835208.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400824169 12568 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 05:49:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 05:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17554@debbugs.gnu.org To: Roland Winkler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 07:49:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WniM2-0004lR-4Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 07:49:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41201 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WniM1-0008Io-Q0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WniLt-0008IX-3B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WniLn-0004oT-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WniLn-0004oP-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WniLm-0004er-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 05:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17554.140082409417823 (code B ref 17554); Fri, 23 May 2014 05:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2014 05:48:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WniKy-0004dM-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:58862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WniKu-0004cw-T1 for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 01:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6000J00I1AEF00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:44:53 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6000CUJIMTT7A0@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:44:53 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <22309.78500.835208.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89381 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:59:33 -0500 > From: "Roland Winkler" > > I guess, quite generally emacs should make sure that the > *Completions* buffer uses a "sufficiently large" window to serve its > purpose. Emacs has never done that: if completions are displayed in an existing window, Emacs would always reuse the size, and not resize it. This is not a regression. If you don't like what you see, I'm sure Martin will be able to tell you how to customize the window creation such that it suits your wishes.