From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20154: 25.0.50; json-encode-string is too slow for large strings Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:03:57 +0200 Message-ID: <831tkjww0y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86twxf68zk.fsf@yandex.ru> <83384zwxdx.fsf@gnu.org> <550C3218.4000903@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426863951 16528 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2015 15:05:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20154@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 20 16:05:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyU7-0004D5-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:05:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44268 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyU7-00055w-0P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyTz-00052w-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyTu-00052d-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyTu-0004zq-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyTt-0008Ea-NG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20154 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20154-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20154.142686385031589 (code B ref 20154); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20154) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2015 15:04:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyT3-0008DR-Sm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:54562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYyT0-0008Cw-QF for 20154@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLI00700MVH1200@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 20154@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:03:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLI006VQN6NY740@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:03:59 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <550C3218.4000903@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100702 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:43:36 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: 20154@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 03/20/2015 04:34 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I suggest to start with a detailed profile of the current > > implementation, > > Any suggestions there? json-encode-char and mapconcat take most of the time, so it seems. > By the way, I've included the example, so you can also profile it > yourself. Yes, I could. What's your point, though?