From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20330: Do not capture build-time $PATH in 'emacs' binary Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:31 +0300 Message-ID: <831tjjamwk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twwjexmg.fsf@gnu.org> <87d235yy39.fsf@gnu.org> <7woamom6cx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8338409iq6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429212931 11238 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2015 19:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ludo@gnu.org, 20330@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 16 21:35:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZA-0006N7-Qg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:35:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZA-0001Xu-59 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZ5-0001VN-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZ1-000872-Pn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZ1-00086u-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YipZ1-0004JY-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:35:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20330 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20330-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20330.142921285616502 (code B ref 20330); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20330) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2015 19:34:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YipYF-0004I5-Fe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:58113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YipYC-0004Hk-LZ for 20330@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NMW00D00ZID4800@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 20330@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:34:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NMW002EPZPS6MA0@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:34:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101596 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: ludo@gnu.org, 20330@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:25:10 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > That'd need to be platform-dependent. > > No, it wouldn't. I'm only concerned with providing a syntactically valid > value, rather than nil. It doesn't actually do anything. But even the syntax is platform-dependent.