From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:32:54 +0300 Message-ID: <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <555A8E62.7060700@cs.ucla.edu> <83h9r8egen.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5t6gex.fsf@gnu.org> <555E09AE.9070208@cs.ucla.edu> <83lhgh6fb2.fsf@gnu.org> <555E2C10.4010501@cs.ucla.edu> <83h9r5670s.fsf@gnu.org> <555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432283596 18897 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2015 08:33:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 22 10:33:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YviOB-0002xY-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:33:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YviOA-0006hr-Ra for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YviO7-0006hk-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YviO2-0001R7-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:47898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YviO2-0001Qr-3o; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NOQ00J00SWSSL00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:32:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NOQ00J68T2WPV60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:32:56 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186732 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:28:21 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I don't see why it's worth our trouble to substitute one incorrect > solution for another, if it's OK that the solutions are approximate. It's OK if we don't want to include back in the test suite the files with DOS EOLs that caused the trouble in the first place. If we don't care about that subtle feature, I'm OK with the current code. After all, it worked nicely until now.