From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does mml-attach-file put the attachment at the very end of the message... Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:00:25 +0200 Message-ID: <831tchd3hi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3kikp5t.fsf@mbork.pl> <878u6q9fnv.fsf@gmail.com> <87oafmkndn.fsf@mbork.pl> <877fma9dxa.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445875285 25046 80.91.229.3 (26 Oct 2015 16:01:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alexis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 26 17:01:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqkCy-0001Tg-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:01:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqkCx-0003I0-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqkCn-00037m-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqkCi-0001oW-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:44224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqkCi-0001o7-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWU00500479AK00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:00:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWU005L64GD9Y20@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:00:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <877fma9dxa.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192661 Archived-At: > From: Alexis > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:28:33 +1100 > Cc: emacs-devel > > OT, iiuc, the preference is for patches to be in unified diff > format. (Please someone correct me if this is wrong!) Some (many?) people indeed prefer that, but I don't mind any of these two formats. IMO, FWIW, YMMV.