From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions about isearch Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:46:08 +0200 Message-ID: <831tbaqwwv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lh9lx6oi.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8q1x1cn.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9k74pkw.fsf@gmail.com> <83bnafse4f.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5jrvih.fsf@rub.de> <87mvtyqzyx.fsf@mbork.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448704007 17530 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2015 09:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, rms@gnu.org, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 10:46:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2c5T-0004l6-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:46:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2c5W-0006s3-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2c5K-0006rv-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:46:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2c5F-0001P3-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:46:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2c5F-0001Oe-6c; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:46:21 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYI00000QZJ4F00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:46:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYI00NHNR574O40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:46:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87mvtyqzyx.fsf@mbork.pl> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195447 Archived-At: > From: Marcin Borkowski > Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:40:06 +0100 > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, Stephen Berman , > bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Watching this discussion, I'm just astonished that no-one complained > (yet?) that searching for "et" does not find "&" (and/or vice versa). Why complain? Emacs lets you customize this feature to do that as well.