From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc. Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:20:06 +0200 Message-ID: <831t9ya8c9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvu1x6t3.fsf@gnu.org> <56772054.8010401@cs.ucla.edu> <83zix4scgf.fsf@gnu.org> <5677DBC9.6030307@cs.ucla.edu> <83io3rst2r.fsf@gnu.org> <567841A6.4090408@cs.ucla.edu> <567844B9.2050308@dancol.org> <5678CD07.8080209@cs.ucla.edu> <5678D3AF.7030101@dancol.org> <5678D620.6070000@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvt2qxm1.fsf@gnu.org> <56797CD9.8010706@cs.ucla.edu> <8337uuqsux.fsf@gnu.org> <5679DC83.70405@cs.ucla.edu> <83oadhp2mj.fsf@gnu.org> <567AD556.6020202@cs.ucla.edu> <567AD766.3060608@dancol.org> <567B5DAB.2000900@cs.ucla.edu> <83fuyromig.fsf@gnu.org> <567C25B1.3020101@dancol.org> <56892FD6.8040708@dancol.org> <83bn92acnl.fsf@gnu.org> <56894318.6060201@dancol.org> <83a8omaa6s.fsf@gnu.org> <56895138.30704@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451841622 4408 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2016 17:20:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 18:20:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmKF-00052a-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:20:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmKE-0002GQ-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmKB-0002G3-7h for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmK6-0001Ec-Tl for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmK6-0001EX-Ql; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2494 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aFmK5-0001Zg-Jq; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:20:06 -0500 In-reply-to: <56895138.30704@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:50:00 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197470 Archived-At: > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, Emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Daniel Colascione > Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:50:00 -0800 > > >> I see nothing wrong with advocacy. > > > > Neither do I. Just don't submit advocacy as a "summary" when a > > decision-maker requests one in order to make up his/her mind. > > I presented your argument (such as it is), then presented mine. If you > don't feel as though I've adequately presented your position, you can > elaborate. What you wrote after your presentation left that presentation tainted. John obviously asked for a balanced summary, where each argument is accompanied by its pros and contras. What you wrote was a far cry from that.