From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23720: 25.0.94; Issues with GUD (gdb-mi) after upgrade from Emacs 23 to 24/25 Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:36:20 +0300 Message-ID: <831t46qviz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5756941E.3000700@oracle.com> <837fe0syx5.fsf@gnu.org> <5759257F.9030502@oracle.com> <83d1nqr1xl.fsf@gnu.org> <5759734A.8090809@oracle.com> <834m92qwmn.fsf@gnu.org> <57597D78.1050508@oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465482994 24572 80.91.229.3 (9 Jun 2016 14:36:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23720@debbugs.gnu.org To: Guilhem Bichot Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 16:36:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bB14D-0002sx-Ow for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:36:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB14C-0006Mx-Il for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB143-0006Mg-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13y-0007TF-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13y-0007TB-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13x-0004nZ-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23720.146548295118429 (code B ref 23720); Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2016 14:35:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34776 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13n-0004nB-LR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13m-0004my-HA for 23720@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:35:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13c-0007Mo-UI for 23720@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13c-0007MZ-R0; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3109 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bB13a-0002rj-Tr; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:35:39 -0400 In-reply-to: <57597D78.1050508@oracle.com> (message from Guilhem Bichot on Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:30:16 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119337 Archived-At: > Cc: 23720@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Guilhem Bichot > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:30:16 +0200 > > >> Pressing this STOP button in emacs23 does interrupt it. > >> It doesn't anymore in emacs24. > >> Is it considered normal? > > > > I don't think so, but I don't have any more wisdom to offer about > > this. AFAIU, -exec-interrupt should have interrupted your program, > > unless it masks signals. > > I see. When I find the time, I'll try diff-ing the code of gud-gdb and > of gdb-mi to find what magic the gud-gdb STOP button has, which makes it > have "a stronger interruption effect". > If I find anything, I'll report it here. I think the answer to that is clear from this: (defun gud-stop-subjob () (interactive) (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (cond ((string-equal gud-target-name "emacs") (comint-stop-subjob)) ((eq gud-minor-mode 'jdb) (gud-call "suspend")) ((eq gud-minor-mode 'gdbmi) (gud-call (gdb-gud-context-command "-exec-interrupt"))) (t (comint-interrupt-subjob))))) As you see i works differently depending on whether gdb-mi is used or not. What I don't understand is why -exec-interrupt doesn't do its job in your case.