From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: lldb support
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 05:42:36 +0200
Message-ID: <831sylgvyr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20161107150552.20e98985@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com>
	<jwv4m3jrqky.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
	<20161107220815.606cd583@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com>
	<E1c4H9c-00087R-E6@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<6c239d49-a92c-1495-7121-4808295a4fc2@dancol.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478662995 11681 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2016 03:43:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 03:43:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, perry@piermont.com
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 09 04:43:11 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1c4Jmp-0000tj-58
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 04:42:55 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36585 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1c4Jms-0001Sm-1v
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:42:58 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33627)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1c4Jml-0001SW-CG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:42:52 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1c4Jmi-0003bR-4x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:42:51 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45870)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1c4Jmi-0003bN-1S; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:42:48 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3521
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1c4JmY-0000H5-5V; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:42:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <6c239d49-a92c-1495-7121-4808295a4fc2@dancol.org> (message from
	Daniel Colascione on Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:17:04 -0800)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209302
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/209302>

> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:17:04 -0800
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> but both LLDB and GDB support the MI protocol.

If LLDB supports the MI protocol, why does it need special support
code?  It should be able to use gdb-mi.el without any changes, no?