From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:31:54 +0200 Message-ID: <831svv5a4l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170122132727.GA12823@acm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485102764 30696 195.159.176.226 (22 Jan 2017 16:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 22 17:32:39 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL4I-0007Vw-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:32:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL4N-0003Zn-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:32:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL3j-0003ZX-6e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL3f-00024j-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL3f-00024f-6O; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3786 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cVL3e-0004nX-6i; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:31:58 -0500 In-reply-to: <20170122132727.GA12823@acm> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:27:27 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211530 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:27:27 +0000 > From: Alan Mackenzie > Cc: Emacs developers > > To those bugs I would add: > #23630: Emacs 25.0.94.1: desktop-read loads buffers in the wrong order. > #19706: Emacs 25.0.50; (+ nil nil -1) in desktop-restore-frameset When were those last tried? Is it possible that they are fixed on the release branch? FWIW, when I finished working on bug#24298, I no longer saw incorrect order of buffers after restoring the desktop: their order was always the same, as long as I restored from the same desktop file. Maybe you just don't like the order in which desktop.el puts them in the desktop file?