From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488298867 17557 195.159.176.226 (28 Feb 2017 16:21:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 17:21:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cikWN-0004BD-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:21:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cikWT-0000lj-8c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cik5J-0001WV-Ss for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cik5G-00027E-QL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cik5G-000278-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cik5G-0002CZ-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.14882971318405 (code B ref 25851); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2017 15:52:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cik4R-0002BV-6P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48123) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cik4P-0002BH-DR for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cik4H-0001tJ-9i for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cik4H-0001tF-6t; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3422 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cik4G-0005ZT-Bs; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:52:00 -0500 In-reply-to: <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:46:22 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129948 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:46:22 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 25851@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Unless Martin will be able to resolve the issue "properly", > > I still fail to understand what Jan had in mind when he eliminated the > gtk_window_move call from xg_set_geometry with PPosition set. We could > try to revert that change and see what happens. If no better idea comes up, I think we should indeed do that. > > I guess > > the only way of shutting up the warning is to use > > g_log_set_writer_func to temporarily set the glib log writer function > > to a dummy one that does nothing, then restore the original writer > > function. That's gross, but what else can be done when you deal with > > libraries which think they are smarter than you are?.. > > IIUC most of what GTK's gometry parsing does is trying to avoid that a > frame appears offscreen. So it's not really about being smart. Emacs > is asking for it. Sorry, I'm not following: what is Emacs asking for?