From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: profiler-report seems to be missing data? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:28:57 +0300 Message-ID: <831sayi5k6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83600aiec6.fsf@gnu.org> <87600ae38v.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534440476 20697 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2018 17:27:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:27:56 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 19:27:52 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM3s-0005FS-5i for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 19:27:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM5w-00077a-V3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM5C-000769-QF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM57-000558-R3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM57-000554-NO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2528 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM56-00088l-93 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:29:09 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Charlie Andrews on Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:12:23 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:117673 Archived-At: > From: Charlie Andrews > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:12:23 -0400 > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > Any tips on making these let bindings faster? I've read online that enabling lexical binding for the plugin might > help. If you have a lot of dead buffers, this should be much faster in the next release. If the problem is that you have a lot of live buffers, maybe you should install some feature that deletes those of them that haven't been used for a while, from time to time.