From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#28691: [PATCH] Add file name handler support for 'make-process' (Bug#28691) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:01:50 +0200 Message-ID: <831s6fexch.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181216233936.208568-1-phst@google.com> <83a7l4dpls.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg853y8.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545076847 23078 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2018 20:00:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 21:00:43 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz4E-0005tJ-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:00:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz6K-0004Cg-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:02:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz5Q-0004CC-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz5N-0007pm-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz5J-0007o1-H0; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:01:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3492 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz5I-00009r-JP; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:01:49 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:04 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231896 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:04 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> "Remote" is just one possibility. It can also be local under > >> a different UID, or it could be local in a virtual machine, ... > > The current implementation regards both cases also as "remote", provided > > by Tramp. file-remote-p returns non-nil. > > It might be unfortune, but I don't recommend to change the function's name. > > I'm not suggesting to rename that function, but I think we should try and > keep this as an exception rather than start using the word "remote" > always meaning "as defined by file-remote-p" rather than the more > common meaning. I think you can trust me to understand all that. I used "remote" to make my point more clear, expressed with simpler wording, that's all.